Cases 1 - 10 of 51
Dyson v. Lane et al
as 1:2024cv00944
Plaintiff:
Stefannie Dyson
Defendant:
Jordan Lane, Jasmine Jermaine Hall, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Titus v. Mead et al
as 1:2023cv05656
Plaintiff:
Adam Titus
Defendant:
Steven Mead, John Doe, Jane/John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McBroom v. TransUnion Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv04151
Plaintiff:
Benjamin McBroom
Defendant:
TransUnion Corporation, Latoya Hughes, Jane Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morris v. Placement Officer et al
as 1:2022cv01375
Plaintiff:
Robert E Morris
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe Placement Officer, John/Jane Doe Sanitation Officer, Keenan Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ruiz v. Francis, Jr. et al
as 3:2020cv50429
Defendant:
John R. Baldwin, Adkison Hilgendorf, Shellie A. and others
Plaintiff:
Israel Ruiz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Port 22, LLC v. The Bank of Nova Scotia et al
as 1:2020cv05270
Defendant:
Scotia Capital (USA) Inc., Jane/John Does 1-50, Corey Flaum and others
Plaintiff:
Port 22, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Blankenship v. The Bank of Nova Scotia et al
as 1:2020cv05267
Defendant:
Scotia Capital (USA) Inc., Jane/John Does 1-50, Scotia Holdings (US) Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Larry Blankenship
Wilkins v. Cook County Illinois et al
as 1:2020cv04965
Defendant:
Sergeant Campos, Cermak Directors, Officers Jane, & John Doe's 1-7 and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Wilkins, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wallace v. Dart et al
as 1:2020cv01366
Defendant:
Jane/John Doe, Tom Dart and Delaney
Plaintiff:
Edward Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ortega v. Bautista et al
as 1:2019cv05194
Defendant:
Doctor Henzee, Jane/John Doe, Doctor Bautista and others
Plaintiff:
John Ortega
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
