Cases 1 - 10 of 1,348
Harper v. Hamilton et al
as 1:2024cv08554
Defendant:
Cook County, Eng, Cook County Sheriff's Dept. and others
Plaintiff:
Draysean Harper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Doe B et al v. Loyola University Chicago
as 1:2024cv08223
Defendant:
Loyola University Chicago
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe B and Jane Doe M
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Hudson v. Truitt et al
as 1:2024cv08271
Defendant:
Greg Morgenthaller, D. Lopez, Jane Doe 2 and others
Plaintiff:
Raekwon Hudson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Tack et al
as 3:2024cv50375
Plaintiff:
Travionte Williams
Defendant:
Officer Miller, Jane Doe, Unknown Nurses and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blanchard v. Hughes et al
as 3:2024cv50374
Defendant:
Watson, Hefferman, Shaw and others
Plaintiff:
Antonio L. Blanchard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Houser v. Winnebago County Adult Probation et al
as 3:2024cv50368
Defendant:
John Or Jane Doe #2, Winnebago County Adult Probation, John Or Jane Doe #4 and others
Plaintiff:
Galen L. Houser
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv08075
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Mayo v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv08127
Defendant:
Tom Dart, Jane Doe and John Doe
Plaintiff:
Michael C Mayo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dampier v. Doe et al
as 1:2024cv07747
Plaintiff:
Ray Timothy Dampier
Defendant:
Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TSURT, LLC et al v. Various John Does et al
as 1:2024cv07541
Plaintiff:
TSURT, LLC and Pearl Jam, L.L.C.
Defendant:
Various John Does, Various Jane Does and XYZ Companies
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
