Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Smith v. L'Oreal USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01709
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Smith
Defendant:
L'Oral USA, Inc., L'Oral USA Products, Inc., Strength of Nature Global, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
In RE: Hair Relaxer Marketing, Sales Practices, And Products Liability Litigation
as 1:2023cv00818
In Re:
In RE: Hair Relaxer Marketing, Sales Practices, And Products Liability Litigation
Plaintiff:
Mahogany Lee, Keaira Gamble, Jenny Mitchell and others
Defendant:
Kimberly Smith, L'Oreal USA, Inc, Soft Sheen Carson, LLC and others
Smith v. Commission Of Social Security
as 1:2019cv06480
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Smith
Defendant:
Commission Of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
McClenon et al v. Postmates Inc.
as 1:2019cv06415
Defendant:
Postmates Inc.
Petitioner:
Adrian Aponte, Antonio Cordova, Alejandra Monsalve and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 185
Armour v. Baldwin et al
as 1:2019cv06042
Plaintiff:
Charles W Armour
Defendant:
Daniel Sullivan, Illinois Department of Corrections (I.D.O.C.), John Baldwin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jenkins v. Smith et al
as 1:2018cv06696
Respondent:
Kimberly Smith and Kim Smith
Petitioner:
Ernest R Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lamb v. Smith
as 1:2018cv02377
Petitioner:
Antoine Lamb
Respondent:
Kimberly Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith et al v. Premier Dermatology et al
as 1:2017cv03712
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Smith and Steve Smith
Defendant:
Premier Dermatology and Forefront Dermatology
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv05498
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Moseley v. Smith et al
as 1:2016cv00211
Plaintiff:
Antoine Moseley
Defendant:
Kimberly Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
