Cases 51 - 60 of 231
Allen et al v. Rednour et al
as 3:2013cv00851
Plaintiff:
Anthony Allen, Darren Henderson, Derrick Parks and others
Defendant:
David A Rednour, Richard Harrington, Shannis Stock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. Anderson et al
as 3:2013cv00723
Plaintiff:
Adrian W. Rogers
Defendant:
Vickie Cook Anderson, Angel Robert Anderson, Angel Christine Sanders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. St Clair County IL et al
as 3:2013cv00650
Plaintiff:
Rufus Edward Jones
Defendant:
St Clair County IL, City of Belleville IL, Brendan F Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Watson et al
as 3:2013cv00478
Plaintiff:
Roger Harris
Defendant:
Rick Watson and St. Clair County, Illinois
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Coe v. Brown et al
as 3:2013cv00433
Plaintiff:
Andrew D Coe
Defendant:
Christine Brown, Nancy, Vipin Shah and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. Halford
as 3:2013cv00304
Plaintiff:
James L Rogers
Defendant:
Mary Halford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stuckey v. Mulch et al
as 3:2012cv01284
Plaintiff:
Ben Stuckey, III
Defendant:
Roger Mulch and Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stuckey v. Mulch et al
as 3:2012cv01250
Plaintiff:
Ben Stuckey, III
Defendant:
Roger Mulch and Alberta Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Childress v. Godinez et al
as 3:2012cv01230
Plaintiff:
Craig A Childress
Defendant:
S A Godinez, Michael Randle, Roger Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zimmerman v. Mulch et al
as 3:2012cv01058
Plaintiff:
Terry C Zimmerman
Defendant:
Roger Mulch and Randy Pollard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
