Cases 31 - 40 of 175
Murphy v. Air Liquid Systems Inc, et al
as 3:2021cv00519
Defendant:
ELECTROLUX HOME PRODUCTS, as successor-by-merger to WHITE CONSOLDATED INDUSTRIES, as successor-by-merger to COPES VULCAN, INC., GARDNER DENVER, INC., ALFA LAVAL, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Murphy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Warren v. Illinois Department of Corrections
as 3:2021cv00343
Plaintiff:
Trent Warren
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Warren v. Pittman et al
as 3:2021cv00347
Plaintiff:
Trent Warren
Defendant:
Nurse Swelty, NP Stover and Dr. Pittman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McNeal et al v. Watson et al
as 3:2021cv00341
Defendant:
C.O. Sabo, Sgt. Scott, Shan Collins and others
Plaintiff:
Shawn LaFollette, Cameron Belk, Sr., Roderick Whittaker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
McNeal et al v. Watson
as 3:2021cv00139
Petitioner:
Robert Sullivan, Terrence Wright, Roderick Whittaker and others
Respondent:
Sheriff Richard Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McNeal et al v. Watson et al
as 3:2021cv00142
Defendant:
Shan Collins, C.O. Reed, Sgt. Moore and others
Plaintiff:
Randy Miller, Terrell Amerson, Paul Donley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Warren v. IDOC et al
as 3:2020cv01295
Defendant:
Jeff Denison, Officer Spencer, IDOC and others
Plaintiff:
Trent Warren
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. City of Alton, Illinois et al
as 3:2020cv00964
Defendant:
John Doe 1, MMadison County States Attorney Office, Katie Warren and others
Plaintiff:
Demetrius D. Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Warren v. Warden
as 3:2020cv00913
Respondent:
Warden
Petitioner:
TerOliver Ray Warren
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Warren v. Bowls et al
as 3:2020cv00914
Defendant:
Brandon Hall and Chariston Bowls
Plaintiff:
TerOliver Warren
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
