Cases 61 - 70 of 733
Parmeley v. FCI Greenville et al
as 3:2023cv01555
Plaintiff:
Jason Parmeley
Defendant:
FCI Greenville, N Mostert, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bull v. Advanced Correctional Healthcare, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv01238
Plaintiff:
Jayson Bull
Defendant:
Advanced Correctional Healthcare, Inc., John D. Lakin, County of Madison, Illinois and others
Intervenor:
Angie Roberts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Huddleston v. Doe et al
as 3:2023cv01222
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey D. Huddleston
Defendant:
John Doe and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morris v. Jeffreys et al
as 3:2023cv01162
Plaintiff:
Robert Morris
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, Sherry Benton, Margaret Madole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abuharba v. Pritzker et al
as 3:2023cv01138
Plaintiff:
Mohammed Abuharba
Defendant:
J. B. Pritzker, Anthony Wills, Wexford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v. Johnson et al
as 3:2023cv00948
Plaintiff:
Travis G. Allen
Defendant:
James Johnson, Jill Moore, Jane Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harper v. Jeffreys et al
as 3:2023cv00912
Plaintiff:
Eazs A. Harper
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, Anthony Wills, Frank Lawrence and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gurlly v. Shah et al
as 3:2023cv00891
Plaintiff:
Makisha Gurlly
Defendant:
Dr. Shah, Grime, Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Amos v. Wills et al
as 3:2023cv00848
Plaintiff:
Cordero Amos
Defendant:
Anthony D. Wills, Jane Doe, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Heasley et al
as 3:2023cv00829
Plaintiff:
Johnny Anderson
Defendant:
C/O Heasley, Jane Doe, Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
