Cases 81 - 90 of 101
Sturdevant v. Winklemeirer et al
as 3:2013cv00519
Plaintiff:
Norbert Sturdevant
Defendant:
M Winklemeirer, K Waggnor, P. Trovillion and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trudeaux v. Roal et al
as 3:2012cv01061
Petitioner:
David Covington Trudeaux
Respondent:
Wendy J Roal and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Moorer-Bey v Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2012cv00212
Plaintiff:
Stephan Moorer-Bey
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Thomas Kane, FBOP Associate Director of Programs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Ousley et al
as 3:2012cv00008
Plaintiff:
Gary L Smith
Defendant:
H Ousley, B Clayton, M Winklmeier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cesal v. Federal Prison Industries, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv00927
Plaintiff:
Craig J. Cesal
Defendant:
Federal Prison Industries, Inc. and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 3:2011cv00701
Plaintiff:
Gary L. Smith
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Combs v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2011cv00267
Plaintiff:
Francis Combs
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and Jason Jarrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Allen v. United States of America et al
as 3:2011cv00161
Plaintiff:
Richard Allen
Defendant:
United States of America, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Harrell Watts and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Warren v. United States et al
as 3:2011cv00149
Plaintiff:
Jack Wade Warren
Defendant:
USA, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Henry Rivas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Allen v. United States of America et al
as 3:2011cv00138
Plaintiff:
Richard Allen
Defendant:
United States of America and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
