Cases 81 - 90 of 377
Prindable v. Gilbert et al
as 3:2021cv00930
Plaintiff:
Luke Alexander Prindable
Defendant:
Phil J. Gilbert, Tanya Kelley, Stephen P. McGlynn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Cato et al
as 3:2021cv00885
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Joyce Ann Cato and State of Illinois Department of Revenue
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Wachter v. Illinois et al
as 3:2021cv00855
Plaintiff:
Marc Wachter
Defendant:
State of Illinois, Rob Jeffries, Medical Director and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prindable v. St. Clair County et al
as 3:2021cv00827
Plaintiff:
Luke Alexander Prindable
Defendant:
St. Clair County, C/O Wilson, C/O Sims and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prindable v. Thorpe et al
as 3:2021cv00826
Plaintiff:
Luke Alexander Prindable
Defendant:
C/O Thorpe, Sergeant Chambers, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Ogden et al
as 3:2021cv00780
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Christina M. Ogden, State of Illinois Department of Revenue, Illinois Department of Healthcare and Family Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Prindable v. Watson et al
as 3:2021cv00697
Defendant:
City of Belleville, Richard Watson, State of Illinois and others
Plaintiff:
Luke Prindable
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brokaw v. Vallabhaneni et al
as 3:2021cv00679
Plaintiff:
Benjamin John Brokaw
Defendant:
Megan Stewart, IL Dept. of Human Services, N Vallabhaneni and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brokaw v. Department of Human Services et al
as 3:2021cv00539
Plaintiff:
Benjamin John Brokaw
Defendant:
Chester Mental Health Center, Gretchen Johnson, State of Illinois Department of Human Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kuna-Jacob v. Illinois et al
as 3:2021cv00452
Defendant:
Secretary of State and State of Illinois
Plaintiff:
Thomas J. Kuna-Jacob
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
