Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Haywood v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2024pq01381
Plaintiff:
Thomas F. Haywood
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Chevron U.S.A. Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Haywood v. Haselmeyer et al
as 3:2023cv00203
Plaintiff:
Donald Haywood
Defendant:
Major Haselmeyer, Jackie Stveve, Counselor/Officer Phelps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haywood v. Jones et al
as 3:2022cv01219
Plaintiff:
Donald Haywood
Defendant:
Anthony B. Jones, Joshuaa Schoenbeck and Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haywood v. Wexford Health Sources Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv01007
Plaintiff:
Donald Haywood
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources Inc., Robert Jeffreys, Melvin Hinton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haywood v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv00731
Plaintiff:
Karl Haywood
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Rob Jeffreys, Anthony Wills and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haywood v. Boy Scouts of America
as 3:2020cv01239
Defendant:
Boy Scouts of America and Hiram Roberts
Plaintiff:
John D Haywood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Haywood v. Doe 1 et al
as 3:2020cv01238
Cross Claimant:
Scanning Lawrence
Defendant:
John Doe 7, John Doe 6, John Doe 3 and others
Plaintiff:
John D. Haywood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haywood v. Jeffreys et al
as 3:2020cv00826
Defendant:
Mr. McFarland, John Doe, Mr. Garrett and others
Plaintiff:
John D Haywood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haywood v. Tubbs et al
as 3:2018cv00526
Plaintiff:
John D Haywood
Defendant:
C/O Tubbs, Mrs. Cunningham and Warden Goings
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haywood v. Shef et al
as 3:2018cv00527
Plaintiff:
John D Haywood
Defendant:
Dr. Shef, Nurse Collins and Nurse Tammy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
