Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Clark et al v. Advanced Composites Group et al
as 3:2015cv01009
Plaintiff:
John Clark and Michele Clark
Defendant:
Advanced Composites Group, AERCO International, Inc., Aii Acquisitions, LLC and others
Cross_claimant:
Lennox Industries, Inc. , Saint-Gobian Abrasives Inc. , Aii Acquisitions, LLC and others
Cross_defendant:
AERCO International, Inc., AWC 1997 Corporation, Advanced Composites Group and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Clark et al v. Lockheed Martin Corporation et al
as 3:2015cv00995
Defendant:
Lockheed Martin Corporation , Advanced Composites Group, Aii Acquisitions, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
John Clark and Michele Clark
Cross_claimant:
Ameron International Corp. , Chicago Bridge & Iron Company , General Electric Company and others
Cross_defendant:
Ameron International Corp. , Chicago Bridge & Iron Company , AERCO International, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Tucker et al v. AERCO International, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00304
Plaintiff:
Joe Donald Tucker and Cora May Tucker
Defendant:
AERCO International, Inc., All Acquisitions, LLC, Air & Liquid Systems Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nesser et al v. Advanced Composites Group et al
as 3:2014cv01367
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Nesser and Karen Nesser
Defendant:
Advanced Composites Group, AERCO International, Inc., Allied Manfacturing, Inc. and others
Cross_defendant:
General Electric Company , AERCO International, Inc., Advanced Composites Group and others
Cross_claimant:
ITT Corporation and Crane Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Kieffer-Moseley v. Air & Liquid System Corporation et al
as 3:2013cv01313
Plaintiff:
Delores J Kieffer-Moseley and Delores J Kiefer-Moseley
Defendant:
Air & Liquid System Corporation , Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., Armstrong International Inc and others
Cross_claimant:
Georgia-Pacific Corporation , Industrial Holding Corporation , Ingersoll-Rand Company and others
Cross_defendant:
Georgia-Pacific Corporation , Air & Liquid System Corporation , Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Fulwider v. AERCO International, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv01220
Counter Defendant:
Ameron International Corporation, The Dow Chemical Company, Research-Cottrell, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Welco Manufacturing Company, Brand Insulations, Inc., Young Insulation Group of St. Louis, Inc. and others
Cross Claimant:
General Cable Industries, Inc., AERCO International, Inc., Vanderbilt Minerals, LLC and others
Cross Defendant:
Dap, Inc., Ralph Lewis Fulwider, Crane Company and others
Counter Claimant:
Grimes Aerospace Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Mohler v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 3:2013cv01221
Defendant:
Sunoco, Inc. (R&M), Welco Manufacturing Company, Murco Wall Products, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Elaine Mohler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Shewmake v. AERCO International, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv01223
Cross Defendant:
Rockwell Automation, Inc., Crane Company, Beazer East, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Welco Manufacturing Company, Brand Insulations, Inc., Young Insulation Group of St. Louis, Inc. and others
Cross Claimant:
General Cable Industries, Inc., AERCO International, Inc., Vanderbilt Minerals, LLC and others
Counter Defendant:
Helen Pearl Shewmake
Counter Claimant:
Grimes Aerospace Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Ruppel v. A.O. Smith Corporation et al
as 3:2012cv00293
Plaintiff:
Henry Ruppel
Defendant:
A.O. Smith Corporation, Alfa Laval, Inc., Armstrong International, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Adams et al v. Armstrong International, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv00857
Defendant:
Genuine Parts Company, Elliott Turbomachinery Company, Inc., McKesson Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Leonard R Adams and Marian M Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
