Cases 11 - 20 of 773
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00065
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Buck Sr. v. City of Hammond School Board
as 2:2024cv00058
Plaintiff:
Paul R. Buck Sr.
Defendant:
City of Hammond School Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sullivan v. Prop and Rotor Management LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00057
Plaintiff:
Chloe Sullivan
Defendant:
Prop and Rotor Management LLC, Penny P Properties LLC d/b/a NWIRENTAL.COM, Gary Fund 2 LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Benyoun v. East Chicago IN City of et al
as 2:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
Mr. Marcus C. Benyoun and Marcus C Benyoun
Defendant:
City of East Chicago, IN, Louis Gonzalez, Adam Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Taebel v. Flynn
as 2:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
Mitch Taebel
Defendant:
Elizabeth A. Flynn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00009
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Porter v. Crook et al
as 2:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
Reginald Darnell Porter
Defendant:
Katie Crook, Daniel Martinez, Gabe Acevedo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shaw v. Dart et al
as 2:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Corey Joseph A. Shaw
Defendant:
Tom Dart, Erin Stokes, Jacob Otto and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Porter v. Murphy et al
as 2:2024cv00005
Plaintiff:
Reginald Darnell Porter
Defendant:
Kevin Murphy, Mary A. DeBoer, Gary S Germann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Wolcott Police Department
as 4:2024cv00002
Plaintiff:
Jerren Jones
Defendant:
Wolcott Police Department and Winkler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
