Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana Before Judge Andrew Rodovich
Cases 11 - 20 of 3,484
Phillips v. Staton et al
as 3:2024cv00352
Plaintiff: Victor D Phillips, Jr
Defendant: Brock M. Staton, M Lester and M Cox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jennings v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00344
Petitioner: Quinton Jennings
Respondent: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Winkler v. Harris et al
as 2:2024cv00149
Plaintiff: Sonya Winkler
Defendant: David John Harris, Franciscan Alliance, Inc., Donald John Trump and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Bowker v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00163
Plaintiff: Jenifer L. Bowker
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Not Yet Classified: General Counsel SSA (Court use only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Garrett v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00331
Petitioner: Ishmell Neal Garrett
Respondent: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hale v. Cornett et al
as 3:2024cv00330
Plaintiff: Alex L. Hale
Defendant: T Cornett, Henrich and Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dunigan v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00329
Petitioner: Lee Evans Dunigan
Respondent: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00142
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Finnegan v. Doe
as 3:2024cv00323
Plaintiff: Russell Grant Finnegan
Defendant: LeAnn Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moorman v. Raglin et al
as 3:2024cv00307
Plaintiff: Kir Moorman
Defendant: Raglin and Darth
Not Yet Classified: WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?