Cases 1 - 10 of 5,401
Freels v. English et al
as 3:2025cv00217
Plaintiff:
Matthew Freels Drake
Defendant:
Brian English, Warden Aaron Smith, Nathanael Angle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burkes v. Grant County Jail
as 1:2025cv00104
Plaintiff:
Jimmie DeVaughn Burkes
Defendant:
Grant County Jail
Unknown:
PENDLETON CF E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv00109
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Weaver v. Indiana Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2025cv00193
Plaintiff:
Donald Weaver and Donald Edward Weaver, Jr
Defendant:
Indiana Department of Corrections, Ron Neal, J Maynard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Indiana State of v. De Cola
as 2:2025cv00105
Plaintiff:
Indiana State of
Defendant:
Thomas De Cola
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Whittenburg v. Harrington et al
as 2:2025cv00101
Plaintiff:
Garrett Whittenburg
Defendant:
Harrington, Pahon and Lisak
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Talley-Smith v. Indiana Department of Workforce Development et al
as 2:2025cv00091
Plaintiff:
Jordan Talley-Smith
Defendant:
Indiana Department of Workforce Development, Review Board and Indiana Court of Appeals
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ellis v. Senical et al
as 1:2025cv00074
Plaintiff:
William Howard Ellis
Defendant:
Grace Senical, Trever Freind and Nick Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sopcich v. Trump Sr
as 2:2025cv00086
Plaintiff:
Jillian Nicole Sopcich
Defendant:
Donald J Trump Sr and JD Vance
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Sheriff
as 2:2025cv00081
Petitioner:
Donald Marvin Johnson
Respondent:
Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
