Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana Before Judge Philip Simon
Cases 1 - 10 of 5,226
Dickerman v. Holcomb
as 1:2024cv00307
Plaintiff: Andrew Dickerman
Defendant: Eric Holcomb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Troy v. Hendrix et al
as 3:2024cv00605
Defendant: John Galipeau, Gary Lewis, Annyie Goeller and others
Plaintiff: Ramel Theodore Troy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Connolly v. US Trustee Program et al
as 2:2024cv00243
Plaintiff: Noreen Connolly
Defendant: James Young, Rubin & Levin, Law Office of Weiss Schmidgall & Hires and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Decker v. USA
as 2:2024cv00245
Respondent: United States of America
Petitioner: Scott Patrick Decker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Tucker v. CME Lending Group LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00235
Defendant: James Metcalf, CME Lending Group LLC and Daniel Fowler
Plaintiff: Travante Tyvaugn Tucker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McNeeley v. Solanger et al
as 3:2024cv00548
Defendant: LaPorte County Jail, LaPorte County and Solanger
Plaintiff: Arthur C McNeeley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taebel v. YouTube
as 2:2024cv00232
Plaintiff: Mitch Taebel
Defendant: YouTube
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv00527
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Taebel v Instagram
as 2:2024cv00226
Defendant: Mitch Taebel and Instagram
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Henderson v. Keller et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv00542
Plaintiff: Shonta Ebony-Sharee Henderson
Defendant: Thomas Patrick Keller and David Franscisco
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?