Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana Before Judge Philip Simon
Cases 1 - 10 of 5,181
Williams v. RentGrow, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00169
Plaintiff: Dominique Williams
Defendant: RentGrow, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Montez v. Aarons et al
as 2:2024cv00161
Plaintiff: Montez Rashaad Williams
Defendant: Aarons, Joseph Kraus, #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Braxton v. Hub Vintage Mall & Antiques LLC The et al
as 2:2024cv00156
Plaintiff: Jack Braxton
Defendant: Hub Vintage Mall & Antiques LLC The, Jennifer Ruiz-Vasquez and John Vasquez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Hill v. Forest River Inc.
as 3:2024cv00347
Plaintiff: Christopher Hill
Defendant: Forest River Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Winkler v. Harris et al
as 2:2024cv00149
Plaintiff: Sonya Winkler
Defendant: David John Harris, Franciscan Alliance, Inc., Donald John Trump and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Smith v. Christenson Copeland et al
as 2:2024cv00130
Plaintiff: Jerry A Smith and Jerry Antwon Smith
Defendant: J Christenson Copeland, M Wala, Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Christenson Copeland et al
as 3:2024cv00306
Plaintiff: Jerry A Smith and Jerry Antwon Smith
Defendant: J Christenson Copeland, M Wala, Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taebel v. Indiana State of et al
as 2:2024cv00127
Plaintiff: Mitch Taebel
Defendant: Indiana State of, Eric Holcomb and Rokita
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Taebel v. Link
as 2:2024cv00124
Plaintiff: Mitch Taebel
Defendant: John A. Link
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sharp v. Gretchen et al
as 1:2024cv00139
Plaintiff: Richard Sharp
Defendant: Gretchen and Tasha
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?