Cases 31 - 40 of 452
Millwood v. Labno et al
as 2:2022cv00212
Defendant:
Debbie Millwood, Christopher Labno, Bureau of Alcohol, tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robinson v. Peck et al
as 2:2022cv00131
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Robinson
Defendant:
Terry Peck, R Pineda, M Garza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McPhail v. The Trustees of Indiana University et al
as 2:2022cv00137
Plaintiff:
Mark McPhail
Defendant:
The Trustees of Indiana University, Ken Iwama, Vicki Roman-Lagunas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Carter v. Sturgeon et al
as 4:2022cv00046
Plaintiff:
Denise Marie Carter
Defendant:
Dusty Sturgeon, Jason McClanne and Lafayette Housing Authority
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Allen v. Thomas Kia of Highland et al
as 2:2022cv00077
Defendant:
Keith O. Allen, Thomas Kia of Highland, Tom Seeley and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Allen v. Dimitrijevic et al
as 2:2022cv00058
Plaintiff:
John Allen
Defendant:
Aleksandra Dimitrijevic and Oscar Martinez, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
State of Indiana v. Butler
as 2:2022cv00121
Plaintiff:
State of Indiana
Defendant:
Kentrae Butler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Nyblom v. Dyer Police Department Town of et al
as 2:2022cv00029
Plaintiff:
Donald Nyblom
Defendant:
Town of Dyer Police Department, Officer O'Donnell, Officer Jonathon Sickles and others
Not Classified By Court:
Richard McDevitt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Winston v. Doe et al
as 2:2022cv00016
Plaintiff:
Charles Winston
Defendant:
PO John Doe 1-2, John Doe and PO Gustavo Garcia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Woolsey v. Woolsey
as 2:2022cv00012
Plaintiff:
Jonathan David Woolsey
Defendant:
Cortney Na Woolsey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
