Cases 21 - 30 of 101
Bell v. Hassel et al
as 3:2021cv00202
Defendant:
Mary Loftus, Andrew Holcomb, Tchapet and others
Plaintiff:
Jacklyn Crystal-Marie Bell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
IMO 2020 Attorney Mass Suspension
as 3:2020mc00017
In Re:
Mark Arnold Werling, John Christopher Havill, Steven Stoy Crone and others
Cochran - RESTRICTED - ACCEPT NO FILINGS v. U.S. Department of Justice et al
as 2:2020cv00327
Defendant:
Diane L Berkowitz, U.S. Department of Justice, James T Moody and others
Plaintiff:
Larry Cochran
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
IMO 2013 Attorney Mass Suspension
as 2:2013mc00060
Respondent:
Anne M Schueler-Hickey, Tanya Renee Bell, Christina Johnston Cloutier and others
In Re:
Failure to Comply With Continuing Legal Education Requrements, Nonpayment of Attorney Registration Fees, and/or Failure to Submit IOLTA Certification re Indiana Supreme Court Order of May 30, 2013
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Cochran v. Nozick et al
as 2:2020cv00240
Defendant:
Diane L Berkowitz, U.S. Department of Justice, James T Moody and others
Plaintiff:
Larry Cochran
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schaap v. Arcuri et al
as 2:2020cv00143
Plaintiff:
Brian Schaap
Defendant:
Sayra Jiminez-Segovia, Arcides Santiago, Louis R Arcuri, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00207
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00364
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Bell v. Grubbs et al
as 4:2018cv00094
Defendant:
Tippecanoe County Sheriff Dept Jail, Chad Grubbs and Jake
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Adrian Bell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bell, Ph.D. v. Ball et al
as 1:2018cv00156
Plaintiff:
Keith F Bell Ph.D.
Defendant:
Lloy Ball and USA Volleyball
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
