Cases 21 - 30 of 35
Summers v. Sands et al
as 3:2015cv00262
Plaintiff:
Charles Davian Summers
Defendant:
Christian E Sands, Daniel C Banina and Timothy G Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sands v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2012cv00206
Plaintiff:
Sharon Louise Sands
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Miscellaneous_party:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Foard v. Stefanatos et al
as 1:2010cv00276
Plaintiff:
Kevi Danzel Foard
Defendant:
Mark Stefanatos, Marland Sands, Ross Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cox v. Beal et al
as 1:2010cv00268
Plaintiff:
Jasmine Cox
Defendant:
Kyle D Beal, Jeff Sands, Ed Beatty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Johnson et al
as 1:2010cv00255
Plaintiff:
Chiffon E Johnson
Defendant:
Marland Sands, Mike Spaulding, Mike Andry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCain v. Spaulding et al
as 1:2010cv00250
Plaintiff:
Willie M McCain, Jr
Defendant:
Mike Spaulding, Marland Sands, Erin Sprunger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rosenbaum et al v. Freight, Lime and Sand Hauling, Inc et al
as 2:2010cv00287
Plaintiff:
Margaret M Rosenbaum and Kent L Rosenbaum
Defendant:
Freight, Lime and Sand Hauling, Inc, Daniel V Myers, Werner Enterprises, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Reynolds v. Stefanatos et al
as 1:2010cv00091
Plaintiff:
Joseph W Reynolds
Defendant:
Mark Stefanatos, Mike Spaulding, Marland Sands and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Sands et al
as 1:2009cv00358
Plaintiff:
Chiffon E Johnson
Defendant:
Marland Sands, Mike Spaulding, Mike Andry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McCain v. Spaulding et al
as 1:2009cv00330
Plaintiff:
Willie M McCain, Jr
Defendant:
Mike Spaulding, Marland Sands, Erin Sprunger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
