Cases 31 - 40 of 170
Jones v. Clark
as 3:2022cv00217
Plaintiff:
Zackary T Jones
Defendant:
P Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brodrick v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00466
Plaintiff:
Diana I Brodrick and Diana I. Brodrick
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores Inc., Wal-Mart Real Estate Business Trust and Jim Clark
Not Classified By Court:
C Erik Chickedantz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Capatina v. Miami Correctional Facility et al
as 3:2021cv00786
Plaintiff:
Randall Lee Max Capatina
Defendant:
Miami Correctional Facility, Wexford Health, Eskenazi Health and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark - RESTRICTED - ACCEPT NO FILINGS v. Warden
as 3:2021cv00824
Petitioner:
Ian Clark and Ian James Clark
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wilcox v. Clark et al
as 3:2021cv00776
Plaintiff:
Sarah Emmalyne Wilcox
Defendant:
Allen Clark, Jessica Basham and Memorial Hospital
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pruitt v. Kimberly-Clark Corp.
as 2:2021cv00307
Plaintiff:
Mario Pruitt
Defendant:
Kimberly-Clark Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Capatina v. Miami Correctional Facility et al
as 1:2021cv00385
Plaintiff:
Randall Lee Max Capatina
Defendant:
Miami Correctional Facility, Wexford Health, Eskenazi Health and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Higgs v. Repay et al
as 2:2021cv00164
Defendant:
Kyle W Allen, Sr, Jerry Tippy, Michael Repay and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony W Higgs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Moline v. Illinois State of et al
as 3:2020cv00906
Defendant:
Illinois State of, Habecker Morris and Dluski LLC, Shashi Vishwanath and others
Plaintiff:
Charlie C Moline
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moline v. Illinois State of et al
as 3:2020cv00908
Defendant:
Illinois State of, Habecker Morris and Dluski LLC, Shashi Vishwanath and others
Plaintiff:
NM a minor 7319 2012
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
