Cases 41 - 50 of 102
Tolliver v. Elkhart County Sheriff Dept et al
as 3:2017cv00609
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Tolliver
Defendant:
Brad Rogers, Capt Perry, Lt Edwards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pratt v. Indiana Dept Corrections et al
as 3:2017cv00436
Plaintiff:
DeParris Pratt
Defendant:
St Joseph County Jail, Julie Lawson, Sgt Omstead and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scruggs v. Penning et al
as 3:2017cv00422
Plaintiff:
Christopher L Scruggs
Defendant:
Sgt Penning, Sgt Pomeroy, Lt Creasy and others
Miscellaneous_party:
WABASH VALLEY E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooper v. I.D.O.C. et al
as 3:2017cv00398
Plaintiff:
Carl Cooper
Defendant:
IDOC, J Salyer, George Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Futch v. Gray et al
as 3:2017cv00387
Plaintiff:
Kenny L Futch
Defendant:
Officer Gray, Officer Flack, Officer Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jenkins v. Lindzy et al
as 3:2017cv00243
Plaintiff:
James O Jenkins
Defendant:
Deputy Lindzy, Lt Wisniewski, Capt Richmond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Torres v. Bigler et al
as 3:2017cv00180
Defendant:
Stefany Bigler, Lt Edwards and Officer Davis
Plaintiff:
Adrian Torres
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mayweather-Brown v. Rodgers et al
as 3:2017cv00179
Plaintiff:
Quintin Mayweather-Brown
Miscellaneous_party:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Defendant:
Bradley Rodgers, Jhon Perry and Lt Edward
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Indiana Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2017cv00071
Plaintiff:
Dedrick Johnson
Defendant:
Indiana Department of Corrections, Lt Watson, Lt Dykstra and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grothjan v. Indiana Department of Correction et al
as 3:2017cv00034
Plaintiff:
Jason Grothjan
Defendant:
Indiana Department of Correction, John Doe #1, Jane Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
