Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Li v. Longview Capital Holdings, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00939
Plaintiff:
Yonggang Li
Defendant:
Longview Capital Holdings, LLC, Longview Capital SVH, LLC, Longview Capital SVH GP LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Maxson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2023cv00019
Plaintiff:
Lis J Maxson and Lisa J Maxson
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi and Commissioner of Social Security
Not Classified By Court:
General Counsel SSA (Court use only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
Yang et al v. Gray et al
as 3:2018cv00611
Defendant:
Edward Gray and Bay & Bay Transfer Co., Inc.
Plaintiff:
Miao Li and Haifeng Yang
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Capitol Indemnity Corporation v. Lin et al
as 1:2016cv00109
Plaintiff:
Capitol Indemnity Corporation
Defendant:
Tian Bao Lin , Bao Yin Zheng , Yi Hong Li and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Morales v. Five Below, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv00236
Plaintiff:
Michael Morales
Defendant:
Five Below, Inc. , Fung Capital, USA , Li & Fung (Trading) Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
L I Combs & Sons Inc v. Creekside of Meadowbrook West LLC et al
as 2:2009cv00354
Plaintiff:
LI Combs & Sons Inc
Defendant:
Creekside of Meadowbrook West LLC, Prudential Huntoon Paige Associates Ltd, United States Department of Housing and Urban Development The and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure
Turcsik v. Mitcheff et al
as 3:2009cv00306
Plaintiff:
Stephen J Turcsik
Defendant:
Dr Michael Mitcheff, Barbara Brubaker, Dr John Israel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Li et al v. Veschak et al
as 2:2007cv00254
Plaintiff:
Zhen Li and Qi Ming Yang
Defendant:
Officer Veschak, Merrillville Town of and Merrillville Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
