Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Beattie et al v. Walmart Supercenter et al
as 3:2022cv00340
Plaintiff:
Karen Beattie and Jim Beattie
Defendant:
Walmart Supercenter and National Construction Rentals, Inc
Not Classified By Court:
Gene Duffin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
IMO 2013 Attorney Mass Suspension
as 2:2013mc00060
Respondent:
Anne M Schueler-Hickey, Tanya Renee Bell, Christina Johnston Cloutier and others
In Re:
Failure to Comply With Continuing Legal Education Requrements, Nonpayment of Attorney Registration Fees, and/or Failure to Submit IOLTA Certification re Indiana Supreme Court Order of May 30, 2013
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Beatty v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2018cv00251
Plaintiff:
Bradley E Beatty
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Miscellaneous_party:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
United States of America v. Wilson et al
as 3:2012mc00025
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Ronnie Gene Wilson and Atlantic Bullion & Coin Inc
Receiver:
Beattie B Ashmore
Beatty et al v. United States of America
as 3:2011cv00041
Plaintiff:
Ralph Beatty and Lucinda Beatty
Defendant:
United States of America
Estate_plaintiff:
Monty Rae Beatty
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Cox v. Beal et al
as 1:2010cv00268
Plaintiff:
Jasmine Cox
Defendant:
Kyle D Beal, Jeff Sands, Ed Beatty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beattie v. Glanz
as 3:2008cv00432
Plaintiff:
Kimberly K Beattie
Defendant:
Joy Glanz
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00017
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00018
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
