Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Clervrain v. Holcomb et al
as 3:2022cv00278
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain
Defendant:
Eric Holcomb, Suzanne Crouch, Holli Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tibbs v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2022cv00079
Plaintiff:
Bray A. Tibbs
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi and Commissioner of Social Security
Not Classified By Court:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Clervrain et al v. Hupfer et al
as 1:2021cv00471
Plaintiff:
Manetiony Clervrain, Francis Cobbina Osei-Fosu and Brandako Inc
Defendant:
Kyle Hupfer, Chuck Williams, Mary Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bray v. Shiparski et al
as 3:2021cv00855
Plaintiff:
ADAM BRAY
Defendant:
OFFICER Kyle Shiparski, OFFICER WILLIE HENDERSON, OFFICER Adam Brinkman and others
Not Classified By Court:
Galen A. Bradley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bray - RESTRICTED - ACCEPT NO FILINGS v. Westville Correctional Facility et al
as 3:2021cv00777
Plaintiff:
Adam Bray
Defendant:
Westville Correctional Facility, Galipeau, Watts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bray v. Boyd et al
as 3:2021cv00215
Defendant:
John T Boyd and Tiger Correctional Services
Plaintiff:
Adam Bray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bray v. Quality Correctional Care LLC
as 3:2021cv00186
Defendant:
Quality Correctional Care LLC
Plaintiff:
Adam Bray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bray v. LaPorte County of Indiana et al
as 3:2020cv01056
Defendant:
John Lake, Michael S Bergerson, LaPorte County of Indiana and others
Plaintiff:
Adam Bray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bray v. LaPorte Indiana County of et al
as 3:2020cv01003
Defendant:
Jimerson, John Lake, Tiger Correctional Services and others
Plaintiff:
Adam Bray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bray v. Indiana State of et al
as 3:2020cv00855
Defendant:
Mark J Roule, Michael Bergerson and Indiana State of
Plaintiff:
Adam Bray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
