Cases 1 - 10 of 76
Smith, Jr. v. USA
as 1:2024cv00358
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Derrick A Smith, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Duffy v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv00279
Plaintiff:
Derrick Jay Duffy
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Knight v. Gulleson et al
as 3:2024cv00646
Plaintiff:
Charles R Knight and Charles R Knight, III
Defendant:
Dennis Gulleson, Katie McMahon, K Watts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker v. Megan
as 1:2024cv00096
Plaintiff:
Derrick D. Baker
Defendant:
Megan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker v. Morrison et al
as 1:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
Derrick D. Baker
Defendant:
Nurse Lindsey Morrison, Nurse Brandy, Nurse Jasmine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker v. Smith et al
as 1:2024cv00089
Plaintiff:
Derrick D. Baker
Defendant:
G. Smith, P. Lake, Swagger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith, Jr. v. USA
as 1:2023cv00486
Petitioner:
Derrick A Smith, Jr.
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Alexander v. Warden
as 3:2023cv00947
Petitioner:
Michael Derrick Alexander and Michael D Alexander
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alexander v. Warden
as 3:2023cv01060
Petitioner:
Michael Derrick Alexander and Michael D Alexander
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Diehl et al v. Landmark Recovery of Carmel LLC
as 3:2023cv00863
Plaintiff:
Suzanne Diehl, Tylor Young, April McElroy and others
Defendant:
Landmark Recovery of Carmel LLC
Not Classified By Court:
Richard F McDevitt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
