Cases 11 - 20 of 149
HUGHES et al v. INDIANA COMMISSIONER DOE (INDIANA DEPT. CORR.) et al
as 1:2009cv00587
Plaintiff:
SEAN M. HUGHES and HAROLD LOESTON
Defendant:
INDIANA COMMISSIONER DOE (INDIANA DEPT. CORR.) and DEFENDANT DOES 1-100
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SHARKEY v. COCHRAN et al
as 1:2009cv00517
Plaintiff:
JONATHON SHARKEY
Defendant:
MEGAN COCHRAN, TERESA LUCCHETTI, MATTHEW PAUL WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CANNON v. HOHMAN et al
as 1:2009cv00514
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH CANNON
Defendant:
MARTA HOHMAN, KYLE SHORE, JENNIFER FRENCH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COBB v. BUSS et al
as 1:2009cv00441
Plaintiff:
MARSHALL COBB, SR.
Defendant:
ED BUSS and BRETT MIZE
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
HARTSELL v. MIZE et al
as 1:2009cv00357
Plaintiff:
CHARLES HARTSELL
Defendant:
BRENT MIZE, TERESA GONZALEZ, RICK SHANNON and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
BROWN v. SALINAS et al
as 1:2009cv00345
Plaintiff:
ORLANDIS M. BROWN
Defendant:
ROBERT SALINAS, GREG GOODNIGHT and MARTY TALBERT
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
HUDGINS v. MARBERRY et al
as 1:2009cv00326
Plaintiff:
DONALD HUDGINS
Defendant:
HELEN J. MARBERRY, B.R. JETT, J. OLIVER and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
GAMBLE v. WRIGHT et al
as 1:2009cv00306
Plaintiff:
KENNETH GAMBLE
Defendant:
JEFF WRIGHT, MR. FINCH, MR. FRENCH and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
MONROE v. BOLING et al
as 1:2009cv00293
Plaintiff:
DAVID E. MONROE
Defendant:
MR. BOLING, MR. KARIGAN, MR. SPIDELL and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
HAURY v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2009cv00186
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL HUNTER HAURY
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et. al., EDDIE G. BUSS and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
