Cases 21 - 30 of 640
MILLER v. LAHRMAN et al
as 4:2009cv00129
Plaintiff:
ROBERT MILLER
Defendant:
MARC LAHRMAN, JEFF WALTERS, RICK HIRTZEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv01182
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
MORRIS v. TEMPLE INLAND
as 1:2009cv01168
Plaintiff:
TERRANCE MORRIS
Defendant:
TEMPLE INLAND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
BASSEL v. MILES et al
as 4:2009cv00124
Plaintiff:
ALLEN JOSEPH BASSEL
Defendant:
ROBERT E. MILES, THE STATE OF ARIZONA, ROBERT BUDOFF and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv01141
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv00119
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv01106
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv00118
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
LINKENBERG et al v. THE CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS et al
as 1:2009cv01107
Plaintiff:
FRANK T. LINKENBERG, EDWARD G. MILLER, JASON E. RAKASKA and others
Defendant:
THE CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS and MICHAEL SPEARS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LOCKARD v. CITY OF LAWRENCEBURG, IN et al
as 4:2009cv00113
Plaintiff:
JAMIE N. LOCKARD
Defendant:
THE CITY OF LAWRENCEBURG, IN, BRIAN MILLER, DEARBORN COUNTY HOSPITAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
