Cases 51 - 60 of 640
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00813
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
LOGAN et al v. WILKINS, M.D. et al
as 1:2009cv00805
Plaintiff:
JOHN A. LOGAN and JOHN A. LOGAN
Defendant:
DONNA WILKINS, M.D., DONNA WILKINS, M.D., RODNEY BARBER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SELBURG et al v. CHASE BANK et al
as 1:2009cv00795
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL WAYNE SELBURG, JR. and MICHAEL MAURER
Defendant:
CHASE BANK, CHARLES BANTZ, JANE SPENCER CRANEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MURPHY et al v. INDIANA WOMEN'S PRISON et al
as 1:2009cv00759
Plaintiff:
SHELLEY MURPHY and DARA MARCUM
Defendant:
INDIANA WOMEN'S PRISON, INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTION and CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00741
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv00083
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
MCHENRY v. CHIEF PROBATION OFFICER
as 1:2009cv00720
Plaintiff:
SHANNON MCHENRY
Defendant:
CHIEF PROBATION OFFICER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00709
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00699
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
