Cases 41 - 50 of 3,720
LYTTLE v. KANE
as 2:2017cv00200
Respondent:
THOMAS R. KANE
Petitioner:
MELVIN R. LYTTLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
TARRH, JR. v. TAGHLEEF INDUSTRIES INC.
as 2:2017cv00196
Defendant:
TAGHLEEF INDUSTRIES INC.
Plaintiff:
RICHARD D. TARRH, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01373
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157 Motion for Withdrawal of Reference
CORNES v. BERRYHILL
as 2:2017cv00195
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Plaintiff:
RAQUEL N. CORNES
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only) and USM (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
LUMPKINS v. KRUEGER
as 2:2017cv00199
Respondent:
J. E. KRUEGER
Petitioner:
RYAN LUMPKINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
LEE v. JULIAN
as 2:2017cv00198
Respondent:
S. JULIAN
Petitioner:
WARREN ANTONIO LEE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
ENGLAND v. SUPERINTENDENT
as 1:2017cv01378
Petitioner:
SHAWN ENGLAND
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BAXLEY v. BERRYHILL
as 1:2017cv01372
Plaintiff:
DEANNA KAY BAXLEY
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only) and USM (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
BUNNELL v. BERRYHILL
as 1:2017cv01357
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Plaintiff:
ANGINETTA BUNNELL
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only) and USM (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01354
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
