Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana Before Judge Jane Magnus-stinson
Cases 41 - 50 of 3,940
MCGINNIS v. MANNING et al
as 1:2023cv02242
Plaintiff: ZACHARY J. MCGINNIS
Defendant: MANNING, MCCAFFERTY, BALL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NOEL v. USA
as 1:2023cv02222
Petitioner: KEVIN NOEL
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
VILCHUCK v. CENTURION OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2023cv02184
Plaintiff: SETH ADAM VILCHUCK
Defendant: CENTURION OF INDIANA, LISA HAMBLEN, CHARLES HOUCHINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
YEANAY v. PERRY
as 1:2024cv00220
Plaintiff: MARKUS YEANAY
Defendant: PERRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FLYNN v. WARDEN
as 2:2023cv00581
Petitioner: DEANDRE' FLYNN
Respondent: WARDEN and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ROSA v. CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00548
Plaintiff: RAFAEL ROSA, III
Defendant: CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC, WHITNEY MOORE, SAMUEL J. BYRD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SIMS v. WARDEN
as 1:2023cv02191
Petitioner: JOHN SIMS
Respondent: WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CROSS v. RULES
as 2:2024cv00004
Petitioner: ANTON CROSS
Respondent: T. RULES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
WILLIAMS v. RULE
as 2:2024cv00006
Petitioner: CHRISTOPHER L. WILLIAMS
Respondent: T. RULE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
STITTS v. WALLEN et al
as 1:2023cv02253
Plaintiff: TURAMA STITTS
Defendant: WALLEN and PENDLETON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?