Cases 31 - 40 of 787
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv03036
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
SNYDER v. PUBLIC SERVICE INDIANA et al
as 1:2016cv02967
Defendant:
DUKE ENERGY and PUBLIC SERVICE INDIANA
Plaintiff:
CHARLES E. SNYDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GANESH v. MARIAN UNIVERSITY, INC. et al
as 1:2016cv02934
Plaintiff:
MANU GANESH
Defendant:
DR. GARREN GEBHARDT and MARIAN UNIVERSITY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00406
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv02834
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 FMLA:Family and Medical Leave Act
MOTON v. I.U. METHODIST HOSPITAL et al
as 1:2016cv02618
Defendant:
HEAD NURSE SHELBY, HILARY D. and I.U. METHODIST HOSPITAL
Plaintiff:
ALASTAIR DOMINIC MOTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
OINGER-VANOVER v. CITY OF SHELBYVILLE et al
as 1:2016cv02624
Defendant:
CITY OF SHELBYVILLE, OTHER UNKNOWN OFFICERS and SHELBYVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT
Plaintiff:
CYNTHIA OINGER-VANOVER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv02349
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv02240
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv02071
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
