Cases 41 - 50 of 1,747
JEFFERS v. KRUEGER
as 2:2017cv00242
Petitioner:
GARLAND JEFFERS
Respondent:
J. E. KRUEGER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BROWN v. KRUEGER
as 2:2017cv00240
Petitioner:
ALLEN BROWN
Respondent:
JEFFREY KRUEGER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
JENKINS v. SMITH et al
as 2:2017cv00223
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF INDIANA, PUTNAMVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and BRIAN SMITH
Petitioner:
ROBERT JENKINS
Miscellaneou:
PUTNAMVILLE CF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SHORTRIDGE v. BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 2:2017cv00226
Respondent:
BUREAU OF PRISONS and THOMAS R. KANE
Petitioner:
KELLY SHORTRIDGE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
ENDRE v. STRONG et al
as 2:2017cv00214
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY A. ENDRE
Defendant:
OFFICER STRONG and UN-KNOWN MEDICAL PERSONAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
DOSSETT v SUPERINTENDENT
as 1:2017cv01521
Petitioner:
BRENDA DOSSETT
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SNAPP v. GIFFITH, et al
as 2:2017cv00212
Defendant:
CLARK COTTOM, JEFF GRIFFITH, SULLIVAN CO. COMMISSIONERS and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN RAY SNAPP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HICKEY v. INDIANA PAROLE BOARD
as 1:2017cv01446
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER M. HICKEY
Respondent:
INDIANA PAROLE BOARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MELENDEZ v. JULIAN et al
as 2:2017cv00202
Respondent:
BUREAU OF PRISONS, S. JULIAN and THOMAS R. KANE
Petitioner:
ALEX A. MELENDEZ
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
HARRIS v DELPH
as 1:2017cv01316
Defendant:
M DELPH
Plaintiff:
DRAKWON HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
