Cases 1 - 10 of 787
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02732
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02617
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act
STOLTZFUS et al v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 2:2017cv00371
Respondent:
COUNTY OF PARKE STATE OF INDIANA and STATE OF INDIANA
Petitioner:
JOHN RIEHL and JOHN STOLTZFUS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02453
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
SARVER v. CASTEEL et al
as 1:2017cv02459
Defendant:
MARK CASTEEL and JENNIFER HASLAM
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS M. SARVER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CUNNINGHAM v. NORTHEAST SCHOOL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2017cv00330
Plaintiff:
DARANGER CUNNINGHAM
Defendant:
MONTY KIRK, TRAVIS NOLTING and NORTHEAST SCHOOL CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02388
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02198
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act
JOHNSON v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
as 1:2017cv01862
Defendant:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Plaintiff:
ZEDRICK JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
A.B., a minor child by his next friend and mother, Jamie Porter v. HARRIS et al
as 2:2017cv00248
Plaintiff:
A.B., a minor child by his next friend and mother, Jamie Porter
Defendant:
MARY BETH HARRIS and KELLY McFARLAND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
