Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana Before Judge Mark Dinsmore
Cases 1 - 10 of 10,205
ST. CLAIR-BEY v. VANIHAL et al
as 2:2024cv00373
Defendant: VANIHAL and V. DEAKINS
Plaintiff: MAYSON ST. CLAIR-BEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BENNETT v. WILLIAMS
as 1:2024cv01268
Plaintiff: NALAKEIO BENNETT
Defendant: A. WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CHINCHILLA v. STATE OF IND et al
as 1:2024cv01247
Defendant: JANE DOE 1, JANE DOE 2, STATE OF IND and others
Plaintiff: JORGE LOPEZ CHINCHILLA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BURGET v. EMERSON et al
as 1:2024cv01252
Respondent: INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and DONALD EMERSON
Petitioner: JOSEPH BURGET
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01235
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
BMO Bank N.A. v. Lucky B Express Inc, an Indiana corporation et al
as 1:2024cv01227
Defendant: Maninder Singh and Lucky B Express Inc, an Indiana corporation
Plaintiff: BMO Bank N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01216
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
TOMPKINS v. WARDEN
as 1:2024cv01229
Respondent: WARDEN
Petitioner: JOHN TOMPKINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MCDANIEL v. REAGLE et al
as 2:2024cv00366
Defendant: CHRISTINA REAGLE, BRIAN LALOUX, JACQUELYNNE PORTER-MARTS and others
Plaintiff: DARRELL MCDANIEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. DUGAN
as 2:2024cv00363
Plaintiff: SHAWN WILLIAMS
Defendant: JESSICA DUGAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?