Cases 81 - 90 of 972
HOOD v. DOC et al
as 1:2023cv02048
Plaintiff:
DERRICK HOOD, JR.
Defendant:
DOC, IVC and PLAINFIELD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HILL v. BORGES
as 3:2023cv00197
Plaintiff:
LARRY E. HILL
Defendant:
LISA BORGES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VALES v. OLDHAM COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2023cv02045
Plaintiff:
LAMONT VALES
Defendant:
OLDHAM COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CLARK v. DAVIESS COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT et al
as 3:2023cv00189
Plaintiff:
CODY LEE CLARK
Defendant:
DAVIESS COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, QUALITY CORRECTIONAL CARE, DO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROSE v. MARION COUNTY A.D.C. PROPERTY ROOM
as 1:2023cv01967
Plaintiff:
LASHAWN M. ROSE, JR.
Defendant:
MARION COUNTY A.D.C. PROPERTY ROOM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SCHWARTZ v. ERNEST et al
as 1:2023cv01968
Plaintiff:
JASON SCHWARTZ
Defendant:
J. ERNEST, JACKSON, FISH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BUTLER v. HYATTE et al
as 1:2023cv01951
Defendant:
WILLIAM HYATTE, BILL, GRANDSTAFF and others
Plaintiff:
IMARIA BUTLER and IMARI BUTLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MOTON v. MCCAFFERTY et al
as 1:2023cv01925
Plaintiff:
ANDRE MOTON
Defendant:
MCCAFFERTY, SHAVER, LAWSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STRONG v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 3:2023cv00179
Plaintiff:
SEAN STRONG
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, BRANCHVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, ARAMARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. NOBLE et al
as 3:2023cv00176
Plaintiff:
CLARENCE A. MARTIN, JR.
Defendant:
L. NOBLE, M. POEHLEIN, DIANE PFEIFFER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
