Cases 111 - 120 of 3,011
CLARK v. DAVIESS COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT et al
as 3:2023cv00189
Plaintiff:
CODY LEE CLARK
Defendant:
DAVIESS COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, QUALITY CORRECTIONAL CARE, DO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROSE v. MARION COUNTY A.D.C. PROPERTY ROOM
as 1:2023cv01967
Plaintiff:
LASHAWN M. ROSE, JR.
Defendant:
MARION COUNTY A.D.C. PROPERTY ROOM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SCHWARTZ v. ERNEST et al
as 1:2023cv01968
Plaintiff:
JASON SCHWARTZ
Defendant:
J. ERNEST, JACKSON, FISH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BUTLER v. HYATTE et al
as 1:2023cv01951
Defendant:
WILLIAM HYATTE, BILL, GRANDSTAFF and others
Plaintiff:
IMARIA BUTLER and IMARI BUTLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01940
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MOTON v. MCCAFFERTY et al
as 1:2023cv01925
Plaintiff:
ANDRE MOTON
Defendant:
MCCAFFERTY, SHAVER, LAWSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STRONG v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 3:2023cv00179
Plaintiff:
SEAN STRONG
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, BRANCHVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, ARAMARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COLLIER v. USA
as 3:2023cv00178
Petitioner:
THEODIS COLLIER
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
MARTIN v. NOBLE et al
as 3:2023cv00176
Plaintiff:
CLARENCE A. MARTIN, JR.
Defendant:
L. NOBLE, M. POEHLEIN, DIANE PFEIFFER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FELLOWS v. WARDEN
as 1:2023cv01903
Petitioner:
AARON FELLOWS
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
