Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana Before Judge Tanya Pratt
Cases 31 - 40 of 1,798
NEATHERY v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2024cv00292
Plaintiff: AUSTIN NOAH NEATHERY
Defendant: CHRISTINA REAGLE, DENNIS REAGLE, ANDREW COLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PEGAN v. ROY et al
as 4:2024cv00028
Plaintiff: VINCENT PEGAN
Defendant: ROY, CASEY, FLOYD COUNTY JAIL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FILZEN v. JACKSON et al
as 1:2024cv00259
Plaintiff: KORRTEL FILZEN
Defendant: JACKSON and HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
REEVES v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2024cv00260
Plaintiff: RICHARD REEVES
Defendant: INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, EMERSON, NEWMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MEADOWS v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 1:2024cv00270
Petitioner: TIMOTHY MEADOWS
Respondent: STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BURK v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2024cv00250
Plaintiff: SCOTT A. BURK
Defendant: DENNIS REAGLE and TRENT ALLEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00244
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOWARD v. USA
as 1:2024cv00217
Petitioner: JALEN HOWARD
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
JOHNSON v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2024cv00210
Plaintiff: HERBERT JOHNSON
Defendant: DENNIS REAGLE, J.D. BALLENGER and COCHRAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RAUDENBUSH v. FOX
as 1:2024cv00196
Petitioner: BRAD RAUDENBUSH
Respondent: C. FOX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?