Cases 1 - 10 of 3,973
OVERTON v. EMMERICH
as 1:2024cv01651
Respondent:
E. EMMERICH
Petitioner:
MARCELLUS CHRISTOPHER OVERTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
DEMPSEY v. PLASSE et al
as 2:2024cv00450
Defendant:
DERIK FELL, PUBLIC SERVANT VIGO COUNTY JAIL, CHALOS and others
Plaintiff:
SEAN DEMPSEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. JENNINGS et al
as 2:2024cv00449
Plaintiff:
CORY MARTEZ SMITH
Defendant:
CASSANDRA JENNINGS, MARY SIMS and SARA CLARKE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PRINCESS CALLIFIA HATUN TUPAK BEY II A/K/A DEJAUNE ANDERSON v. LOGANSPORT STATE HOSPITAL
as 1:2024cv01576
Defendant:
LOGANSPORT STATE HOSPITAL
Plaintiff:
PRINCESS CALLIFIA HATUN TUPAK BEY II A/K/A DEJAUNE ANDERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PAYNE v. SWAIM et al
as 2:2024cv00368
Defendant:
SAM SWAIM and STEVE CVENGROSS
Plaintiff:
JESSIE LEE PAYNE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOSHUA W. MURPHY AKA WALI ABUU JIHAD v. DECKARD et al
as 1:2024cv01546
Defendant:
ROBIN BYERS and MATT DECKARD
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA W. MURPHY AKA WALI ABUU JIHAD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01260
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LOVE v. LEITZ et al
as 2:2024cv00365
Defendant:
SIMMERMAN, DAVID LEITZ, MADISON PASSMORE and others
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA D. LOVE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. MATEVOUSIAN et al
as 2:2024cv00377
Defendant:
L. BATCHELOR, MERENDINO, C. ZEHNER and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIE L. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
PARKER v. NEAL et al
as 1:2024cv01510
Defendant:
DAWN BUSS, RON NEAL, JOE SNYDER and others
Plaintiff:
COURTNEY PARKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
