Cases 11 - 20 of 3,081
DURHAM v. WARDEN
as 1:2024cv01528
Respondent:
WARDEN
Petitioner:
DARRELL S. DURHAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JOHNSON v. ADAMS et al
as 1:2024cv01535
Defendant:
TUTTLE, ADAMS and SENSE
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER M. JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
SANDERS v. ALLEN
as 1:2024cv01502
Respondent:
TRENT ALLEN
Petitioner:
DAMIEN BLAINE SANDERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GRIMES v. HUNT et al
as 1:2024cv01445
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM R. GRIMES
Defendant:
HUGH HUNT, CLARK COLTOM, ANN MISCHLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LONG v. WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2024cv01447
Defendant:
TEAH JEAKOR, TAMMY SORMIENTO, CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA and others
Plaintiff:
DUSTIN EUGENE LONG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TACKETT v. AWOLUSI et al
as 1:2024cv01449
Defendant:
DAVID and AWOLUSI
Plaintiff:
DAVID TACKETT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOOD v. PENDLETON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2024cv01435
Defendant:
PENDLETON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Plaintiff:
DERRICK HOOD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIS v. USA
as 1:2024cv01422
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER DAVIS
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
DURHAM v. JONES et al
as 1:2024cv01415
Defendant:
BETTE JO JONES, FAYETTE COUNTY and FAYETTE COUNTY PROSECUTORS OFFICE
Plaintiff:
DEREK DURHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BUSH v. PENDLETON CORRECTIONAL FAILITY et al
as 1:2024cv01420
Plaintiff:
DEMARCUS DEMERROW BUSH
Defendant:
PENDLETON CORRECTIONAL FAILITY, MARLEX LANEE and DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
