Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana Before Judge Richard Young
Cases 1 - 10 of 3,017
JOHNSON v. WARDEN
as 1:2024cv01052
Petitioner: JOSEPH JOHNSON
Respondent: WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
POWELL v. WARDEN
as 1:2024cv01042
Petitioner: MATT POWELL
Respondent: WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HENSON v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORR. et al
as 1:2024cv01033
Plaintiff: JARED MALACHI HENSON
Defendant: INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORR., STEVEN JACKSON, LISA WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CRAMER v. QUAKENBUSH
as 1:2024cv00714
Plaintiff: KEVIN CRAMER
Defendant: DENNIS QUAKENBUSH, JOHN DOE and JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SCOTT v. CENTERION CORPERATION et al
as 1:2024cv01021
Plaintiff: EDDRELL SCOTT
Defendant: CENTERION CORPERATION, VERDON, ALLEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOOD v. WARDEN OF PLAINFIELD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2024cv01024
Plaintiff: DERRICK HOOD
Defendant: WARDEN OF PLAINFIELD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LOCKETT v. ARAMARK et al
as 1:2024cv01005
Plaintiff: CHRISTOPHER LOCKETT
Defendant: ARAMARK, FOX, FOSTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PARR v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 3:2024cv00099
Petitioner: TOMMY W. PARR
Respondent: STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GRACE v. CALVART et al
as 1:2024cv00999
Plaintiff: O'SHUN UNTHA GRACE
Defendant: JAMIE CALVART and BRIAN ENGLISH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WALTERS v. WELLPATH et al
as 1:2024cv00978
Plaintiff: LANCE WALTERS and CARINA WALTERS
Defendant: WELLPATH, AKANBI and KERRY J. FORRESTAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?