Cases 31 - 40 of 1,814
LAUDERDALE v. DELAWARE COUNTY et al
as 1:2024cv00569
Plaintiff:
LAMONE LAUDERDALE
Defendant:
DELAWARE COUNTY, TONY SKINNER, SHERIFF, CANTEEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COMBS v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2024cv00517
Plaintiff:
DANNY TYLER COMBS
Defendant:
REAGLE, MAGGIE BRYANT, JACKSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WALLACE v. UNKNOWN OFFICERS OF THE FLOYD COUNTY JAIL et al
as 4:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER W. WALLACE
Defendant:
UNKNOWN OFFICERS OF THE FLOYD COUNTY JAIL, BARNES, CAMPBELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SIMS v. SILVIA et al
as 1:2024cv00454
Plaintiff:
JOHN SIMS
Defendant:
SILVIA, DUNLAP, WELCH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS v. FORESTAL et al
as 1:2024cv00446
Plaintiff:
JOHN ERIC THOMAS
Defendant:
KERRY J. FORESTAL, FEMI, JANE DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WALLACE v. GAHAN et al
as 4:2024cv00045
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER WADE WALLACE, SR.
Defendant:
JEFF GAHAN, TODD BAILEY, HATFIELD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCCLINTON v. USA
as 1:2024cv00419
Petitioner:
DAYONTA MCCLINTON
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
ANDERSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv00403
Petitioner:
CAROLYN ANDERSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
ANDERSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv00405
Petitioner:
TODD ANDERSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
