Cases 71 - 80 of 1,815
HOOD v. ADENUGBA
as 1:2023cv02255
Plaintiff:
DERRICK L. HOOD
Defendant:
ADENUGBA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. WHITE COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2023cv02260
Plaintiff:
JERREN JONES
Defendant:
WHITE COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HAMBEL v. MERSHON
as 1:2023cv02231
Plaintiff:
JOE HAMBEL
Defendant:
JOHN MERSHON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STEVEN JAMES ALMEIDA, Chosen: CASSANDRA ALMEIDA v. CENTURION et al
as 1:2023cv02227
Plaintiff:
STEVEN JAMES ALMEIDA, Chosen: CASSANDRA ALMEIDA
Defendant:
CENTURION, VERDEN, MAYS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PARTLOW v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv02207
Plaintiff:
EDWARD M. PARTLOW
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, CHARLENE BURKETT, A. BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02183
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SCOTT v. BENEFIEL et al
as 1:2023cv02178
Plaintiff:
KENNETH E. SCOTT
Defendant:
AARON BENEFIEL, ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICE, LLC, IND. DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CROSS v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 1:2023cv02173
Plaintiff:
VINCENT E. CROSS
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, EMERSON, AUSTIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. ENGLISH et al
as 1:2023cv02164
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER M. JOHNSON
Defendant:
GASON ENGLISH, ARAMARK, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION'S and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VERMILLION et al v. CENTURION HEALTH, INC. et al
as 1:2023cv02165
Plaintiff:
JAY F. VERMILLION
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH, INC., JOHN L. MERSHON, VERNON L. OSBURN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
