Cases 21 - 30 of 68
MOCKBEE v. LEE et al
as 1:2019cv00548
Defendant:
VINCE KLEE, KENDLE DAVIS, JAMES HUMPHREY and others
Plaintiff:
BRANDON MOCKBEE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROGERS et al v. CITY OF MARION, INDIANA et al
as 1:2019cv00532
Plaintiff:
AARON ROGERS and TINA M. ROGERS
Defendant:
CITY OF MARION, INDIANA, OFFICER BRIAN DAVIS and BRIAN DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS v. HANCOCK COUNTY, IN et al
as 1:2018cv02436
Defendant:
HANCOCK COUNTY, IN, MCCORDSVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, HANCOCK COUNTY SHERIFFS' DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff:
GENE T. DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2018cv02159
Plaintiff:
GENE T. DAVIS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS v. US PRESIDENTIAL TASK FORCE
as 1:2018cv01267
Plaintiff:
GENE THOMAS DAVIS
FBI/DEA:
US PRESIDENTIAL TASK FORCE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WHITTED v. KONKLE et al
as 4:2017cv00241
Defendant:
JAN DAVIS and CODY R. KONKLE
Plaintiff:
MOLLY R. WHITTED
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DAVIS v. COMMUNITY HOWARD REGIONAL HEALTH, INC. et al
as 1:2017cv03803
Defendant:
COMMUNITY HEALTH NETWORK, INC. and COMMUNITY HOWARD REGIONAL HEALTH, INC.
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM H. DAVIS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
COOPER v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS
as 1:2017cv02467
Defendant:
CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS and GREGORY DAVIS
Plaintiff:
CHARLES W. COOPER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DAVIS v. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORK et al
as 1:2017cv01961
Defendant:
CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS and DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORK
Plaintiff:
HARRY DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ROBINETTE et al v. PIERCE et al
as 2:2016cv00391
Defendant:
DAVIS AERNE, JEFFREY BROWN, GREENE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff:
LUCAS GECHTMAN and CRYSTAL ROBINETTE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
