Cases 61 - 70 of 146
ALBRECHTSEN v. DOE 1 et al
as 1:2017cv01665
Plaintiff:
MARK A. ALBRECHTSEN
Defendant:
DOE 1, DOE 2 and DOE 3
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
HIPPENSTEEL v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 3:2017cv00083
Defendant:
TIMOTHY BOTTOMS, DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR VANDERBURGH COUNTY, FIVE MEMBER ETHICS COMMISSION and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID HIPPENSTEEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
STEINHARDT v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS et al
as 1:2017cv00304
Defendant:
CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS and AARON SPARKS
Plaintiff:
MARK T STEINHARDT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LONG v. MADISON COUNTY SHERIFF
as 1:2017cv00142
Plaintiff:
MARK A. LONG
Defendant:
MADISON COUNTY SHERIFF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ROBB v. LOOP et al
as 4:2017cv00002
Defendant:
ELIZABETH BREWER, FLOYD COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, FRANK LOOP and others
Plaintiff:
MARK J. ROBB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
HUERTA v. EWING et al
as 2:2016cv00397
Defendant:
BRAD ANDERSON, JUDY ANDERSON, MARK D. BIRD and others
Plaintiff:
JAUSTON HUERTA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
FIGUEROA v. SPEARS et al
as 1:2016cv01329
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINE ANN FIGUEROA
Defendant:
INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPT., MARK SPEARS and JEFF WEBB
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LANE et al v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2016cv00962
Plaintiff:
MELODY BARROWS, NICHOLAS BARROWS and COLE LANE
Defendant:
CORIZON HEALTH, INC., CORIZON, LLC, CRAIG GRAGE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
HERZ, PH.D v. GOODMAN et al
as 1:2016cv00876
Defendant:
EVAN BAYH, GERALD BEPKO, J. RICHARD CAMPBELL and others
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN WENDY HERZ, PH.D
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
BROOKS-ALBRECHTSEN v. MITCHELL
as 1:2015cv01854
Plaintiff:
MARK A. BROOKS-ALBRECHTSEN
Defendant:
MITCHELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
