Civil Rights Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Cases 211 - 220 of 2,061
BUTCHER v. CLERK, PUTNAM COUNTY, INDIANA
as 2:2021cv00422
Plaintiff: DANIEL BUTCHER
Defendant: CLERK, PUTNAM COUNTY, INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WOODARD v. MORGAN et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv02813
Plaintiff: CARLOS WOODARD
Defendant: MEGAN MORGAN and HENDRICKS COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TACKETT v. WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv02809
Plaintiff: SKYLER TACKETT
Defendant: WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC, KIMBERLY MYERS, M.D. CARL E. KUENZLI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BARKER v. CARTER et al
as 2:2021cv00413
Plaintiff: KENTE BARKER
Defendant: ROBERT CARTER, JR., GWENDOLYN M. HORTH, CHARLES F. MILLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARRIS v. GEO GROUP, INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2021cv02815
Plaintiff: COTY SCOTT HARRIS
Defendant: GEO GROUP, INCORPORATED and NEW CASTLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JESSIE-BEY v. CARTER et al
as 1:2021cv02757
Plaintiff: GREGORY JOEL JESSIE-BEY
Defendant: ROBERT CARTER, GEO, MARK SEVIER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHORT v. HENDERSON
as 2:2021cv00393
Plaintiff: PAUL M SHORT
Defendant: I HENDERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCCLAIN v. FERGUSON et al
as 4:2021cv00165
Plaintiff: LAVITA MCCLAIN
Defendant: SCOTT FERGUSON, CLAYTON BANISTER, MARK REYNOLDS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BATEMAN v. KNIGHT et al
as 1:2021cv02627
Plaintiff: VERNON BATEMAN and VERNON T BATEMAN
Defendant: KNIGHT, JOHN DOES and MS. CARNEYGEE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KYLES v. INDIANA PAROLE BOARD et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv02614
Plaintiff: DEREK TYRONE KYLES, JR.
Defendant: INDIANA PAROLE BOARD, FREDERICK A. MEDLEY and JAMES W. SHAFFER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?