Civil Rights Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Cases 31 - 40 of 2,057
WOODY et al v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv02315
Plaintiff: BRANDON WOODY, ANTHONY WHITE, MARCO WEBSTER and others
Defendant: DENNIS REAGLE, MAGGIE BRYANT, CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
YEANAY v. PERRY
as 1:2024cv00220
Plaintiff: MARKUS YEANAY
Defendant: PERRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CORDELLIONE v. GRAY
as 3:2023cv00212
Plaintiff: AUTUMN E. CORDELLIONE, RICHARDSON C. JONATHAN and JONATHAN C. RICHARDSON
Defendant: TONY GRAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MACKALL v. FORKNER
as 1:2023cv02249
Plaintiff: TIMOTHY MACKALL
Defendant: JUSTIN P. FORKNER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DILLEY v. NANCREDE ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC. et al
as 1:2023cv02159
Plaintiff: DANIEL K. DILLEY and MICHAEL L. BENNETT
Defendant: NANCREDE ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC., CHRIS NANCREDE, AQUA INDIANA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 d Civil Rights (Death)
PETERS v. WARDEN
as 1:2023cv02135
Plaintiff: FRED PETERS
Defendant: WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WALKER v. DOE(S)
as 2:2023cv00542
Plaintiff: JOHNIE AKWAN WALKER
Defendant: JOHN DOE(S)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GONGORA v. REGAL
as 1:2023cv02107
Plaintiff: THOMAS GONGORA
Defendant: CHRISTINA REGAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KING v. VANDERBURG COUNTY CORRECTIONAL CENTER et al
as 3:2023cv00173
Plaintiff: NICHOLAS R. KING
Defendant: VANDERBURG COUNTY CORRECTIONAL CENTER, STOTLER and RYAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WALKER v. DOE(S)
as 2:2023cv00544
Plaintiff: JOHNIE AKWAN WALKER
Defendant: JOHN DOE(S)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?