Cases 1 - 10 of 27
WOODY et al v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv02315
Plaintiff:
BRANDON WOODY, ANTHONY WHITE, MARCO WEBSTER and others
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, MAGGIE BRYANT, CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COX v. US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2023cv01601
Plaintiff:
WELBY THOMAS COX, JR.
Defendant:
US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and ZACHARY A. MYERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
SHEPHERD v. COX et al
as 1:2019cv00575
Defendant:
CORPORAL HAUSE, C.O. MOORE, SHERIFF DOUG COX and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID L SHEPHERD, JR. and DAVID L. SHEPHERD, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BLEDSOE v. COX et al
as 1:2019cv00212
Defendant:
C.O. Butcher, Major DUANE BURGESS, C.O. Kendall and others
Plaintiff:
Kyle R Bledsoe and KYLE R. BLEDSOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MILLER v. COX et al
as 1:2018cv03966
Defendant:
DUANE BURGESS, JOHN DOE, ANDREWS and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT L. MILLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LUKINS v. COX et al
as 1:2018cv03969
Defendant:
DOUG COX, DUANE BURGESS, JOHN DOE and others
Plaintiff:
MARK A LUKINS and MARK A. LUKINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COX v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2017cv00226
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM COX
Defendant:
GWEN HORTH, STANLEY KNIGHT, VIRGIL R. MADDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ALLRED v. DANIELS et al
as 2:2016cv00122
Plaintiff:
SHAWN LEE ALLRED
Defendant:
COX, CHARLIE DANIELS, DIRECTOR MEDICAL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
HAMPTON et al v. FENN et al
as 1:2016cv00792
Defendant:
AARON COX, FENN, WENDY KNIGHT and others
Plaintiff:
EDWARD M. HAMPTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STONE-DUNLAP et al v. KNIGHT et al
as 1:2016cv00688
Defendant:
AARON COX, PAM GREY, WENDY KNIGHT and others
Plaintiff:
EDWARD M. HAMPTON and ERIC STONE-DUNLAP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
