Cases 11 - 20 of 154
WALTERS v. BELLO et al
as 1:2024cv00449
Plaintiff:
LANA W. WALTERS and LANCE W. WALTERS
Defendant:
T. BELLO, SALAJA, DEPUTY U and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS v. FORESTAL et al
as 1:2024cv00446
Plaintiff:
JOHN ERIC THOMAS
Defendant:
KERRY J. FORESTAL, FEMI, JANE DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. MHM HEALTH PROFESSIONALS, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
MHM HEALTH PROFESSIONALS, LLC, CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC, CRISTINA REAGLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CROSBY v. KALLIS et al
as 2:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY ROY CROSBY
Defendant:
J. KALLIS, OFFICER JANE DOE, SAJNAJ and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
PARKER v. LEOHR et al
as 2:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA PARKER
Defendant:
MATT LEOHR, A. MOSELEY and JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WRIGHT v. STORM et al
as 1:2024cv00366
Plaintiff:
CARLTON WRIGHT
Defendant:
STORM, JENNIFER FRENCH, R. DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RUBY v. GAINS et al
as 4:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL RAY RUBY
Defendant:
RONNIE GAINS, NEW ALBANY POLICE DEPT., BRIDGET ALGARIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ORR v. VANIHEL et al
as 1:2023cv02323
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ORR
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, JANE DOE, CHRISTINA REAGLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ORR v. SNYDER et al
as 1:2023cv02320
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ORR
Defendant:
JERRY SNYDER, B. LALOUX, FRANK VANIHEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOLDER v. SIMONS et al
as 1:2023cv02065
Plaintiff:
DAVID TRA-VON HOLDER
Defendant:
SIMONS, MARION COUNTY ADC SUPERVISORS and JOHN DOE/JANE DOE (ETL) 1-3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
