Cases 101 - 110 of 11,258
CASSEL v. GIVENS et al
as 2:2024cv00406
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE CASSEL
Defendant:
CARL WASSBERG and HUNTER GIVENS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01419
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
PARKLAND, INC. v. CITY OF SEYMOUR et al
as 1:2024cv01092
Plaintiff:
PARKLAND, INC. d/b/a THE VILLAGE GREEN HOMES
Defendant:
CLERK TREASURER DARRIN BOAS, CITY OF SEYMOUR, SEYMOUR BOARD OF WORKS AND PUBLIC SAFETY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Violation of Due Process and Equal Protection
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01102
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
KOORSEN v. OLER et al
as 1:2024cv01064
Defendant:
RICHMOND POLICE DEPT. and RON OLER
Plaintiff:
JAMES A. KOORSEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01059
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
DHANI v. HAMILTON COUNTY DRAINAGE BOARD et al
as 1:2024cv01405
Defendant:
MARK E HEIRBRANDT, STEVEN C. DILLINGER, KENTON C. WARD and others
Plaintiff:
HARVINDER SINGH DHANI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01403
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01410
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01041
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
