Cases 11 - 20 of 88
EVE et al v. SUPERINTENDENT, INDIANA STATE POLICE
as 1:2020cv02036
Plaintiff:
KAREN BURKHART, SISTERS OF PROVIDENCE OF SAINT-MARY-OF-THE WOODS, INDIANA, ASHLEY K. EVE and others
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT, INDIANA STATE POLICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BICKERS v. CITY OF TERRE HAUTE et al
as 2:2020cv00219
Defendant:
BILL TREADWAY, JOHN COLLETT, PAUL CLAPP and others
Plaintiff:
OWNER MIKE BICKERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00039
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
HERZ v. CONGREGATION BETH-EL ZEDECK et al
as 1:2019cv04810
Defendant:
JOE HOGSETT, ETZ CHAIM SEPHARDIC CONGREGATION, JUDGE MARC ROTHENBERG and others
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN WENDY HERZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv02963
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HERZ v. YOUNG et al
as 1:2019cv01661
Defendant:
DAVID KENNEDY, MONROE CIRCUIT COURT, MICHAEL CASTELLARIN and others
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN WENDY HERZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
HERZ v. YOUNG et al
as 1:2018cv03447
Defendant:
P. FREDERICK PFENNINGER, JUDGE MARC ROTHENBERG, BERNARD PYLITT and others
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN WENDY HERZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00693
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623 Job Discrimination (Age)
STOLTZFUS et al v. HUTCHINS et al
as 2:2017cv00359
Defendant:
GEOFFREY CANFIELD, SHAWN CLOVER, JUSTIN COLE and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN RIEHL and JOHN STOLTZFUS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HUERTA v. EWING et al
as 2:2016cv00397
Defendant:
BRAD ANDERSON, JUDY ANDERSON, MARK D. BIRD and others
Plaintiff:
JAUSTON HUERTA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
