Cases 21 - 30 of 231
NOEL v. INDIANA METRO POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2022cv00677
Plaintiff:
JAMES FRANK NOEL, JR. and JAMES F. NOEL, JR.
Defendant:
INDIANA METRO POLICE DEPARTMENT, CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, MARION COUNTY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MARTIN v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2022cv00120
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, K. GILMORE, THOMAS WELLINGTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00015
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap)
BYRD v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 1:2022cv00176
Plaintiff:
SHAWN C. BYRD
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA and DELAWARE COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HANKINS et al v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY et al
as 1:2022cv00080
Plaintiff:
REBECCA JANE HANKINS and DAVID JAMES ROACH
Defendant:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY, SHERRI BENTLY, TROY TARPIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 dp Civil Rights - Denial of Due Process
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02965
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MERCADO v. RAMIREZ
as 1:2021cv02961
Plaintiff:
ANGELITO C MERCADO
Defendant:
Aida Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLERVRAIN et al v. DIMON et al
as 1:2021cv02918
Plaintiff:
MANETIONY CLERVRAIN, BRANDAKO, INC and ASHELEY CARMELLE DORSAINVILLE
Defendant:
JAMIE DIMON, ASHLEY BACON, LORI A. BEER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHADWICK et al v. CROUSORE et al
as 1:2021cv02921
Plaintiff:
DUSTIN J. CHADWICK and C. M. C.
Defendant:
BRETT CROUSORE, BRIAN ATKINSON and JIM BERISH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ARP II v. INDIANA STATE POLICE et al
as 1:2021cv02626
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL C ARP II
Defendant:
INDIANA STATE POLICE, DOUGLAS CARTER, Charles Sorrells and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
