Cases 21 - 30 of 36
MAPES v. MYERS
as 1:2017cv01396
Plaintiff:
ERIC MAPES
Defendant:
BRENT MYERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01016
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
BLACKBURN v. MYERS et al
as 1:2014cv01115
Plaintiff:
TIA M BLACKBURN
Defendant:
INDIANAPOLIS HOUSING AGENCY and RUFUS BUD MYERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
STEWART v. CITY OF BLOOMINGTON, POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2013cv00480
Defendant:
CITY OF BLOOMINGTON, POLICE DEPARTMENT, SCOTT MYERS, SCOTT OLDHAM and others
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK STEWART
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00443
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
SMITH v. ROSS et al
as 1:2013cv00341
Defendant:
C. LEHMAN, JAMES MYERS, J. PARIS and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL M. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MOTE v. HOWARD COUNTY et al
as 1:2012cv01602
Defendant:
Lt. ROBIN BYERS, HOWARD COUNTY, MONA MYERS and others
Plaintiff:
JARED MOTE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JONES v. WILSON et al
as 1:2012cv00594
Defendant:
LT. ROBIN BYERS, JANE DOES 1-10, JOHN DOES 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
JASON JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01654
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
LATTIMER v. VIGO COUNTY SHERIFF et al
as 2:2011cv00201
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DAVE MYERS, NEW CASTLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and others
Plaintiff:
ART LATTIMER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
