Cases 21 - 30 of 236
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00016
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
SMITH v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS et al
as 1:2022cv02262
Plaintiff:
TYRONE SMITH
Defendant:
CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, GERMAYNE CURRY, SCOTT NICKELS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00176
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
COLLINS v. MONTGOMERY et al
as 2:2022cv00409
Plaintiff:
JOSHAWA SCOTT COLLINS
Defendant:
PHELAN MONTGOMERY, ANN SMITH MISCHLER and CLARK COTTOM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01492
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
REYNOLDS v. SHELTON et al
as 1:2022cv01345
Plaintiff:
RAE-JEAN REYNOLDS
Defendant:
KEITH SHELTON, JOSHUA SMITH, JOSEPH REYNOLDS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01097
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
MARTIN v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2022cv00120
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, K. GILMORE, THOMAS WELLINGTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. CLARK COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE et al
as 4:2022cv00036
Plaintiff:
DAKOTA LEE SMITH
Defendant:
CLARK COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, JAMEY NOEL, DONOVAN HARROD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CHAMBERS v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2022cv00492
Plaintiff:
KENNETH CHAMBERS
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA, DENNIS QUAKENBUSH, JOSH CAREY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 dp Civil Rights - Denial of Due Process
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
